<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why am I asking you to use Firefox on a Photography Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/</link>
	<description>Photography for the Serious Amateur.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What keeps you addicted to photography? &#124; Digital Photography News and Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>What keeps you addicted to photography? &#124; Digital Photography News and Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondphototips.com/?p=22#comment-721</guid>
		<description>[...] Why am I asking you to use Firefox on a Photography Blog? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why am I asking you to use Firefox on a Photography Blog? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susheel Chandradhas</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Susheel Chandradhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondphototips.com/?p=22#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Mathew, I do the same, but you do see the pain involved in doing that. Why two stylesheets? Why two skillsets? Why two standards? It just does not make sense to me. That&#039;s why this post. :D Thanks for stopping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew, I do the same, but you do see the pain involved in doing that. Why two stylesheets? Why two skillsets? Why two standards? It just does not make sense to me. That&#8217;s why this post. <img src='http://www.beyondphototips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondphototips.com/?p=22#comment-715</guid>
		<description>I understand your pain, but I design for both firefox and IE despite IE&#039;s lack of compliance with standards. If you&#039;re only designing for Firefox, you&#039;re failing to cater to ~80+% people on the web, not a great idea. My main solution is to design for one set of browsers (say Firefox and Safari), then create a second stylesheet that&#039;s pulled if the user is running IE. Still, it would be nice if Microsoft would finally comply instead of doing things their own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand your pain, but I design for both firefox and IE despite IE&#8217;s lack of compliance with standards. If you&#8217;re only designing for Firefox, you&#8217;re failing to cater to ~80+% people on the web, not a great idea. My main solution is to design for one set of browsers (say Firefox and Safari), then create a second stylesheet that&#8217;s pulled if the user is running IE. Still, it would be nice if Microsoft would finally comply instead of doing things their own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Download Firefox 3 Today - Be Part of a World Record!</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Download Firefox 3 Today - Be Part of a World Record!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondphototips.com/?p=22#comment-219</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned a number of reasons to use a browser like firefox on my photography blog, but now with the release of Firefox 3 to the public, there are more reasons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned a number of reasons to use a browser like firefox on my photography blog, but now with the release of Firefox 3 to the public, there are more reasons [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammy Straub</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammy Straub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondphototips.com/?p=22#comment-29</guid>
		<description>The only problem with using Firefox to browse photography based content is its inability to understand embeded ICC profiles in images.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If the users gamma settings are anything other than the images native gamma, it&#039;ll look wonky in most browsers.   The only browser that I now of right now that reads and honors the ICC profiles is Safari.  Firefox is slated to have the functionality added at version 3.0 &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Be that as it may, I&#039;m also recommending most people use Firefox :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with using Firefox to browse photography based content is its inability to understand embeded ICC profiles in images.</p>
<p>If the users gamma settings are anything other than the images native gamma, it&#8217;ll look wonky in most browsers.   The only browser that I now of right now that reads and honors the ICC profiles is Safari.  Firefox is slated to have the functionality added at version 3.0 </p>
<p>Be that as it may, I&#8217;m also recommending most people use Firefox <img src='http://www.beyondphototips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondphototips.com/2007/03/30/why-am-i-asking-you-to-use-firefox-on-a-photography-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondphototips.com/?p=22#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I started using firefox a few months back and it works great especial when printing out a web page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using firefox a few months back and it works great especial when printing out a web page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
